Topic summary
96% 1 analyzed article/video 1,337 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Honduran Politics results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40.3% saturation with 2,154 hits . Analysis detected 8,435 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 78% (4,659 of 20,964 topics). This Honduran Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Honduran Politics
Topic details
Total words: 5,348
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.8% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 40.3% 40.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.3% 17.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 40.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst