Topic summary
91% 2 analyzed articles/videos 8,053 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Home & Garden results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 64.6% saturation with 17,407 hits . Analysis detected 44,658 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,940 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 65% (5,565 of 15,690 topics). This Home & Garden is worse (more manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group. Home & Garden
Topic details
Total words: 26,940
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.5% percentile 3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles26.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 64.6% 64.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.6% 9.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 64.6%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% Bandwagon: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst