Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 13,314 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victoria McDonnell results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Bandwagon , and Biased Writer Voice , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 30,763 hits . Analysis detected 72,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 46,134 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,023 of 6,628 authors). This Victoria McDonnell is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group. Victoria McDonnell
Author details
Total words: 46,134
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.5% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles46.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 66.7% 66.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.0% 0.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 66.7%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Bandwagon: Author 9.6%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst