Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Hollywood Industry results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,066 hits. Analysis detected 5,721 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,770 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Hollywood Industry is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Hollywood Industry
Topic details
Total words: 7,770
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.7%13.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.3%12.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos