Topic summary
11% 1 analyzed article/video 1,108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Historical Analysis results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 183 hits . Analysis detected 1,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (12,698 of 16,102 topics). This Historical Analysis is better (less manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group. Historical Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 3,324
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4% Composition/Division: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst