Topic summary
⁠22%2 analyzed articles/videos1,045 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hiring Practices results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 730 hits. Analysis detected 4,021 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,079 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,655 of 16,240 topics). This Hiring Practices is better (less manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Hiring Practices
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,079
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos