Topic summary
⁠87%3 analyzed articles/videos2,046 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hindu Nationalism results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 1,455 hits. Analysis detected 9,052 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,617 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,831 of 16,562 topics). This Hindu Nationalism is worse (more manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
Hindu Nationalism
Topic details
Total words: 6,617
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.7% percentile
3.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.0%22.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.2%18.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos