Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 293 analyzed words
BS Summary: These High Winds results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 39% saturation with 343 hits . Analysis detected 1,982 faulty-reasoning hits from 879 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.1% and a BS Rank of 97% (624 of 16,562 topics). This High Winds is worse (more manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group. High Winds
Topic details
Total words: 879
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.2% percentile 14.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles879 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 39.0% 39.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 27.3% 27.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 23.2% 23.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 33.0% 33.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 15.4% 15.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 16.4% 16.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 14.1% 14.1% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Topic 39.0%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Topic 33.0%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Topic 27.3%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 26.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 23.2%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.7%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.5% Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst