Topic summary
⁠91%5 analyzed articles/videos2,747 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heroism results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 1,767 hits. Analysis detected 11,370 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,034 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (6,687 of 15,783 topics). This Heroism is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Heroism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,034
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.6% percentile
3.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.6%19.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.2%13.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos