Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 614 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marcus Brotherton results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Straw Man , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 52.2% saturation with 961 hits . Analysis detected 3,299 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,842 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 87% (871 of 6,629 authors). This Marcus Brotherton is worse (more manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group. Marcus Brotherton
Author details
Total words: 1,842
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.9% percentile 5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 52.2% 52.2% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 26.0% 26.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Author 52.2%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 26.0%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Straw Man: Author 12.8%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.8%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst