Topic summary
⁠37%4 analyzed articles/videos168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Tech results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 443 hits. Analysis detected 3,210 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,101 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (7,666 of 15,358 topics). This Health Tech is worse (more manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Health Tech
Topic details
Total words: 4,101
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.8%10.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.3%8.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos