Topic summary
⁠11%1 analyzed article/video311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Care Fraud results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Unattributed Quote, and Anchoring Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 135 hits. Analysis detected 516 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (5,312 of 22,928 topics). This Health Care Fraud is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Health Care Fraud
Topic details
Total words: 1,244
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510076.8% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos