Topic summary
15%5 analyzed articles/videos1,484 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health And Medicine results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 1,565 hits. Analysis detected 11,082 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,101 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (13,501 of 15,882 topics). This Health And Medicine is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group.
Health And Medicine
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510015.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.4%10.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate