Topic summary
⁠43%2 analyzed articles/videos1,386 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harm Reduction Strategies results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 619 hits. Analysis detected 4,855 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,536 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,675 of 16,562 topics). This Harm Reduction Strategies is better (less manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Harm Reduction Strategies
Topic details
Total words: 5,536
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos