Topic summary
⁠82%2 analyzed articles/videos2,549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Halo Campaign Evolved results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 1,986 hits. Analysis detected 7,208 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,647 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,364 of 16,562 topics). This Halo Campaign Evolved is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
Halo Campaign Evolved
Topic details
Total words: 7,647
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.0%26.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.2%13.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos