Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hail Storms results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.3% saturation with 322 hits. Analysis detected 1,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 711 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (525 of 16,562 topics). This Hail Storms is worse (more manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group.
Hail Storms
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠97%Hail Storms (selected)16%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 711
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

97% percentile
025507510096.8% percentile
15.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles711 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 45.3%45.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 22.4%22.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 35.6%35.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 28.1%28.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 17.9%17.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 22.6%22.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 13.5%13.5%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 7.7%7.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 45.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 35.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 28.1%, sitewide 9.1%Framing Effect: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 17.9%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.4%Halo Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos