Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rocky Mountain PBS results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.3% saturation with 322 hits. Analysis detected 1,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 711 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (161 of 6,362 authors). This Rocky Mountain PBS is worse (more manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group.
Rocky Mountain PBS
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠98%Rocky Mountain PBS (selected)16%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 711
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

98% percentile
025507510097.5% percentile
15.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles711 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 45.3%45.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 22.4%22.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 35.6%35.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 28.1%28.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 17.9%17.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 13.5%13.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 22.6%22.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 13.5%13.5%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Author 7.7%7.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Author 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 45.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 35.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 28.1%, sitewide 9.1%Framing Effect: Author 24.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 22.6%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Author 22.4%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 17.9%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Genetic Fallacy: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.4%Halo Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Author 7.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos