Topic summary
99% 1 analyzed article/video 1,751 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Great Power Status results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 1,099 hits . Analysis detected 8,930 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,253 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,569 of 16,562 topics). This Great Power Status is worse (more manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Great Power Status
Topic details
Total words: 5,253
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.4% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 20.9% 20.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.0%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst