Author summary
89% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,751 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edward Luttwak results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 1,863 hits . Analysis detected 17,465 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,332 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,779 of 6,359 authors). This Edward Luttwak is worse (more manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group. Edward Luttwak
Author details
Total words: 10,332
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.0% percentile 3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.0% 18.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 15.7% 15.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.7% 13.7% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.4% 14.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 15.7%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.2%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst