Topic summary
30% 11 analyzed articles/videos 4,609 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Regulations results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 2,801 hits . Analysis detected 20,572 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,828 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (13,634 of 15,778 topics). This Government Regulations is better (less manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group. Government Regulations
Topic details
Total words: 26,828
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score11 analyzed articles26.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst