Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Government Budgets results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 661 hits. Analysis detected 5,888 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,212 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,447 topics). This Government Budgets is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Government Budgets
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos