Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Gordon Chang results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 468 hits . Analysis detected 3,206 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Gordon Chang is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Gordon Chang
Topic details
Total words: 1,892
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 23.0% 23.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 24.7% 24.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 17.0% 17.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 11.2% 11.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 24.7%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 23.0%, sitewide 4.6% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 15.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Burden of Proof: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst