Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,228 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Oil Supply results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 1,313 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,448 of 16,562 topics). This Global Oil Supply is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group.
Global Oil Supply
Topic details
Total words: 3,684
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.1% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.7%8.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 0.4%0.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos