Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Glen Canyon Dam results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 1,577 hits. Analysis detected 7,692 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,118 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,094 of 15,769 topics). This Glen Canyon Dam is better (less manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Glen Canyon Dam
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,118
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos