Topic summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video749 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Glasgow School Of Art results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 414 hits. Analysis detected 2,814 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,247 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,393 of 16,562 topics). This Glasgow School Of Art is worse (more manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Glasgow School Of Art
Topic details
Total words: 2,247
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510067.4% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.4%18.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.4%13.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.0%6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos