Author summary
93% 1 analyzed article/video 749 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catherine Slessor results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 414 hits . Analysis detected 2,814 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,247 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,625 of 6,628 authors). This Catherine Slessor is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group. Catherine Slessor
Author details
Total words: 2,247
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.5% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.4% 18.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.7% 4.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.0% 6.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst