Topic summary
⁠94%2 analyzed articles/videos1,398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Geopolitical Strategy results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 641 hits. Analysis detected 5,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,936 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,201 of 16,494 topics). This Geopolitical Strategy is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Geopolitical Strategy
Topic details
Total words: 4,936
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.3% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.7%11.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.0%9.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.8%10.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.0%13.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.7%10.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos