Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Murray Brewster results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 403 hits. Analysis detected 3,444 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,741 of 6,537 authors). This Murray Brewster is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Murray Brewster
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
74%Murray Brewster (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,968
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

73% percentile
025507510073.4% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.5%11.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.5%8.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 13.6%13.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.9%9.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 6.5%6.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 13.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 11.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos