Topic summary
68%8 analyzed articles/videos9,373 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gentrification results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 3,319 hits. Analysis detected 34,566 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,382 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (12,486 of 15,448 topics). This Gentrification is better (less manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles36.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate