Topic summary
⁠69%5 analyzed articles/videos3,022 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Generational Differences results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 4,813 hits. Analysis detected 26,834 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,857 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,141 of 16,243 topics). This Generational Differences is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Generational Differences
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles23.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 20.2%20.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos