Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Gender In Sports results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Straw Man, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 424 hits. Analysis detected 3,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,403 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Gender In Sports is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Gender In Sports
Topic details
Total words: 2,403
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.6%17.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.0%9.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.6%6.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 7.2%7.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Straw Man: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 0.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos