Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,142 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gdp Growth results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 688 hits. Analysis detected 5,813 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,053 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,261 of 15,326 topics). This Gdp Growth is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Gdp Growth
Topic details
Total words: 4,053
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.2% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.0%17.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.5%13.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.7%6.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos