Topic summary
70% 6 analyzed articles/videos 876 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gaza Conflict results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 6,036 hits . Analysis detected 39,397 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,948 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,450 of 16,562 topics). This Gaza Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group. Gaza Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 33,948
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.9% percentile 2.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles33.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.8% 17.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
WAMU 15% 7/16/2026, 1:09:28 PM