Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 302 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gay Rights results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 179 hits . Analysis detected 1,590 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 77% (3,941 of 16,562 topics). This Gay Rights is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. Gay Rights
Topic details
Total words: 1,208
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.2% percentile 5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Tu Quoque: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 0.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Red Herring: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.7% Recency Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst