Topic summary
⁠19%2 analyzed articles/videos1,497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gastrointestinal Health results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 592 hits. Analysis detected 4,247 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,988 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (12,552 of 16,562 topics). This Gastrointestinal Health is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Gastrointestinal Health
Topic details
Total words: 5,988
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos