Topic summary
⁠57%2 analyzed articles/videos2,414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gambling Addiction results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,163 hits. Analysis detected 9,794 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,769 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,392 of 16,562 topics). This Gambling Addiction is better (less manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Gambling Addiction
Topic details
Total words: 8,769
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.3% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos