Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video529 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Galaxy Evolution results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 349 hits. Analysis detected 1,672 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,376 of 16,562 topics). This Galaxy Evolution is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Galaxy Evolution
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,116
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.5% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.5%16.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.8%7.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos