Author summary
20% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,246 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ivan Farkas results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 598 hits . Analysis detected 3,341 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,267 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (3,075 of 6,448 authors). This Ivan Farkas is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group. Ivan Farkas
Author details
Total words: 4,267
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.3% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.0% 14.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.1% 8.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.1%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst