Topic summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video516 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gainesville Politics results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Recency Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 228 hits. Analysis detected 1,119 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,441 of 16,562 topics). This Gainesville Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.
Gainesville Politics
Topic details
Total words: 1,548
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510067.2% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.7%14.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.1%7.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.2%5.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos