Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These French National Football Team results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 1,438 hits. Analysis detected 7,307 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,016 of 16,562 topics). This French National Football Team is worse (more manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
French National Football Team
Topic details
Total words: 6,156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.6% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.4%23.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos