Topic summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Francisco Lindor results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and False Dilemma, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 181 hits. Analysis detected 2,329 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,041 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,145 of 16,562 topics). This Francisco Lindor is worse (more manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group.
Francisco Lindor
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,041
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510087.1% percentile
7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 14.8%14.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.4%17.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.9%8.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.1%8.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.7%12.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos