Topic summary
27% 2 analyzed articles/videos 624 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fort Bend results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 146 hits . Analysis detected 1,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,872 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 50% (8,279 of 16,562 topics). This Fort Bend is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group. Fort Bend
Topic details
Total words: 1,872
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.0% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst