Author summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These HPM Staff results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 96 faulty-reasoning hits from 504 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (392 of 6,628 authors). This HPM Staff is worse (more manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group.
HPM Staff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠95%HPM Staff (selected)10%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 504
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

94% percentile
025507510094.1% percentile
9.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles504 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 13.3%13.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos