Topic summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video343 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Forest Service Operations results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Halo Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 133 hits. Analysis detected 668 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,029 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,371 of 16,562 topics). This Forest Service Operations is worse (more manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group.
Forest Service Operations
Topic details
Total words: 1,029
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510067.6% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.0%5.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.7%7.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 12.9%12.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos