Topic summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,915 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Culture results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Halo Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 41.3% saturation with 2,375 hits. Analysis detected 14,652 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,745 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 86% (2,405 of 16,562 topics). This Food Culture is worse (more manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.
Food Culture
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,745
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510085.5% percentile
6.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 31.4%31.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 41.3%41.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 27.5%27.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 21.5%21.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.6%14.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 16.0%16.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 14.4%14.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 41.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 31.4%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 27.5%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos