Topic summary
⁠52%2 analyzed articles/videos1,541 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Allergies results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 510 hits. Analysis detected 3,280 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,623 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (10,425 of 15,494 topics). This Food Allergies is better (less manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
Food Allergies
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,623
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos