Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Flood Prevention results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Pessimism Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 174 hits . Analysis detected 1,654 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,080 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,313 topics). This Flood Prevention is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Flood Prevention
Topic details
Total words: 1,080
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 14.9% 14.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 16.1% 16.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst