Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video350 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fisheries results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 216 hits. Analysis detected 1,512 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 81% (3,247 of 16,562 topics). This Fisheries is worse (more manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group.
Fisheries
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,400
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510080.4% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.6%13.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.1%13.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 14.6%14.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 15.4%15.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos