Topic summary
⁠88%2 analyzed articles/videos1,675 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fiscal Responsibility results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 868 hits. Analysis detected 6,598 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,025 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,780 of 16,562 topics). This Fiscal Responsibility is worse (more manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Fiscal Responsibility
Topic details
Total words: 5,025
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.0% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.3%17.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.0%13.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.0%10.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos