Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos4,695 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Disclosures results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 1,588 hits. Analysis detected 15,540 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,780 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (14,382 of 16,562 topics). This Financial Disclosures is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group.
Financial Disclosures
Topic details
Total words: 18,780
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510013.2% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles18.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos